Author |
Topic ![Next Topic Next Topic](images/icon_go_right.gif) |
|
Larry Bezark
Member Macrodontia
![](images/icon_star_purple.gif) ![](images/icon_star_purple.gif) ![](images/icon_star_purple.gif) ![](images/icon_star_purple.gif) ![](images/icon_star_purple.gif)
USA
2219 Posts |
Posted - 22/11/2015 : 03:43:35
|
![](/public/imgforum/Larry Bezark/2015112234224_7875 Sabah Malaysia 10mm.JPG) 134.8 KB
Sabah, 10 mm. Is this a species of Ostedes? |
Edited by - Xavier on 27/01/2016 17:39:48 |
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif)
France
12095 Posts |
Posted - 22/11/2015 : 09:14:07
|
I think it is Ostedes pauperata Pascoe, 1859 by seeing the holotype picture from MNHN of Ostedes basilana Pic, 1944 which is a synonym. |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
dryobius
Member Rosenbergia
![](images/icon_star_blue.gif) ![](images/icon_star_blue.gif) ![](images/icon_star_blue.gif) ![](images/icon_star_blue.gif)
USA
1885 Posts |
Posted - 22/11/2015 : 14:02:53
|
I don't think the synonymy is correct if the illustrated specimen is O. basilana Pic. For that matter, the type of O. pauperata is stated as "Aru" and the type of basilana is Basilan (Philippines). I have seen many Ostedes from Sabah which I have identified as O. pauperata and they all quite similar.
The picture posted by Larry looks like another species I have from Sabah. I have a total of 5 or 6 species of Ostedes from Sabah (unidentified), as well as O. pauperata, O. variegata, and O. brunneovariegata.
I have not seen types of O. borneana, griseoapicaloides, or laterifusca.
O. pauperata may occur in many areas ( Aru, Philippines, Borneo)... I don't know. The genus has only been studied by Breuning, and I think there are possibly mistakes with his work, and possibly new species in Borneo. |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif)
France
12095 Posts |
Posted - 22/11/2015 : 14:10:40
|
Yes, you might be right. Really, I do not know : I have only seen my bad picture from MNHN... |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
Larry Bezark
Member Macrodontia
![](images/icon_star_purple.gif) ![](images/icon_star_purple.gif) ![](images/icon_star_purple.gif) ![](images/icon_star_purple.gif) ![](images/icon_star_purple.gif)
USA
2219 Posts |
Posted - 22/11/2015 : 17:31:37
|
Thanks guys,
Larry B. |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
dryobius
Member Rosenbergia
![](images/icon_star_blue.gif) ![](images/icon_star_blue.gif) ![](images/icon_star_blue.gif) ![](images/icon_star_blue.gif)
USA
1885 Posts |
Posted - 22/11/2015 : 18:55:19
|
Here is a better match. This is the type of O. griseoapicaloides Breuning, 1977 from MNHN.
[ Actually we should say: O. griseoapicalis Breuning, 1969 [ nec Pic, 1944 ] ]
I must thank a member of our board for providing me with this photo. I normally do not post other people's photographs without their permission, but I hope he understands that it is extremely useful in this case.
![](../public/imgforum/dryobius/20151122185440_Ostedes_griseoapicalis_Holotype.JPG) 56 KB |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
Larry Bezark
Member Macrodontia
![](images/icon_star_purple.gif) ![](images/icon_star_purple.gif) ![](images/icon_star_purple.gif) ![](images/icon_star_purple.gif) ![](images/icon_star_purple.gif)
USA
2219 Posts |
Posted - 22/11/2015 : 19:00:23
|
Thanks Dan
Larry B. |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif)
France
12095 Posts |
Posted - 24/10/2019 : 09:33:36
|
quote: Originally posted by dryobius
I don't think the synonymy is correct if the illustrated specimen is O. basilana Pic. For that matter, the type of O. pauperata is stated as "Aru" and the type of basilana is Basilan (Philippines).
For that matter, you are probably right: holotype picture of Ostedes basilana Pic, 1944 (here) do not fit with Ostedes pauperata Pascoe, 1859 (HT BMNH Moluques, Aru), which is a species with longer elytra, with apex different. I think that the synonymy O. basilana / O.pauperata is wrong.
I add pictures of Ostedes basilana Pic, 1944 from Philippines in a new topic. |
Edited by - Xavier on 24/10/2019 09:38:22 |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
|
Topic ![Next Topic Next Topic](images/icon_go_right.gif) |
|