| Author |
 Topic  |
|
|
cerambyphil
Member Rosalia
France
675 Posts |
 Posted - 03/02/2017 : 20:51:42
|
 
Voici une étrange espèce que je ne peux résister à vous présenter !
taille = 29,5 mm
Je suis désolé Xavier, mais ma photo originale de l'étiquette est droite, je n'arrive pas à la télécharger dans le même sens !
|
Edited by - Capitaine on 04/02/2017 14:24:59 |
|
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
France
12017 Posts |
Posted - 03/02/2017 : 21:30:56
|
Hop, magie 
Cette espèce est superbe, merci du partage ! |
Edited by - Xavier on 03/02/2017 21:31:48 |
 |
|
|
dryobius
Member Rosenbergia
USA
1885 Posts |
Posted - 03/02/2017 : 22:52:25
|
Broun (1880) described this species in the genus Blosyropus.
In 1883, Broun described a new genus and re-named B. simpliceps as Ptychopterus rugosus. However, Ptychopterus was already a genus of Cleridae.
In KIRKALDY, G. W. 1910, On some preoccupied generic names in insects. The Canadian Entomologist. page 8; proposed the replacement name of Nesoptychias for Ptychopterus.
Nesoptychias thus has priority over Pteroptychus Aurivillius, 1912.
If this is confusing, I understand.
Unfortunately, TITAN does not have the correct name. I would appreciate someone telling Gerard, as my emails to him usually fail.
The correct name should be Nesoptychias simpliceps (Broun, 1880)
Also, I do not understand how this came to be in Callidiopini. It is possibly related to Blosyropus as Broun originally stated.
Whatever the case is, both Nesoptychias and Blosyropus are nice looking cerambycids. |
|
|
|
Francesco
Forum Admin
Luxembourg
9412 Posts |
Posted - 03/02/2017 : 23:17:48
|
| This genus should belong to Phlyctaenodini, as correctly reported in BioLib. |
|
|
|
Jérôme Sudre
Member Rosenbergia
France
1770 Posts |
Posted - 06/02/2017 : 19:00:39
|
| En effet comme l'écrit Dan ce genre ressemble beaucoup à Blosyropus. C'est un groupe très particulier. |
|
|
| |
Topic |
|
Nouvelle Zelande, Nesoptychias simpliceps
