Cerambycoidea Forum
Cerambycoidea Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Cerambycidae Lamiinae
 Homonoeini
 India: Notomulciber viraktamathi sp. nov.
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Send Topic to a Friend
 Printer Friendly
| More
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

sangamesh
Member Purpuricenus

India
426 Posts

Posted - 23/09/2017 :  20:06:34  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote

377.11 KB

I've two males and a female specimen of this species, the specimen posted here is a female (15 mm)...it looks close to N. decemmaculatus but differs considerably... as like N. decemmaculatus the current specimen also has five spots on elytra but size is considerably varied...
the differences from N. decemmaculatus are: there is no white band at the elytral base and apex is not drawn out into a lobe but elytral apex is obliquely truncated and the outer angle is regularly rounded...
any opinion on its affinities?

Edited by - Xavier on 23/11/2018 07:19:55

Francesco
Forum Admin

Luxembourg
9402 Posts

Posted - 23/09/2017 :  21:48:57  Show Profile  Email Poster  Visit Francesco's Homepage  Reply with Quote
It does not seem decemmaculatus: the brick-reddish pubescence on the pronotum is absent in this species and the elytral punctures are different. The elytral spots have a different trend as well, not reliable to decemmaculatus.
You can also check the Sinhalese N. bryanti (Breuning, 1939) and N. strandi (Breuning, 1939), which probably form an Indian group, but I think you can describe a new species.
Go to Top of Page

sangamesh
Member Purpuricenus

India
426 Posts

Posted - 24/09/2017 :  08:50:36  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
Thank you very much...
Go to Top of Page

Xaurus
Member Rosenbergia

Germany
1891 Posts

Posted - 26/09/2017 :  01:02:11  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
I can exclude N. bryanti (Breuning, 1939) and N. strandi (Breuning, 1939), both are different, really a strange one, but before description, please check nearby groups: there are confusions within genera too.
Go to Top of Page

sangamesh
Member Purpuricenus

India
426 Posts

Posted - 23/11/2018 :  06:01:14  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
This species formally has a name now: Notomulciber viraktamathi sp. nov.

Thank you everyone for the support.

The article is made available here

Edited by - sangamesh on 23/11/2018 06:10:03
Go to Top of Page

Xavier
Scientific Collaborator

France
12002 Posts

Posted - 23/11/2018 :  07:21:08  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
Congratulations Sangamesh !
Go to Top of Page

Francesco
Forum Admin

Luxembourg
9402 Posts

Posted - 23/11/2018 :  08:39:11  Show Profile  Email Poster  Visit Francesco's Homepage  Reply with Quote
All my compliments, Sangamesh !
Go to Top of Page

Pierre-Olivier Maquart
Member Rosalia

United Kingdom
784 Posts

Posted - 23/11/2018 :  11:06:43  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
Congratulations !
Go to Top of Page

sangamesh
Member Purpuricenus

India
426 Posts

Posted - 23/11/2018 :  11:22:07  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
Thank you
Go to Top of Page

Xaurus
Member Rosenbergia

Germany
1891 Posts

Posted - 26/11/2018 :  00:15:29  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
good paper Sangamesh - gratulation
Go to Top of Page

sangamesh
Member Purpuricenus

India
426 Posts

Posted - 27/11/2018 :  02:44:58  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
Thank you very much
Go to Top of Page

dryobius
Member Rosenbergia

USA
1885 Posts

Posted - 27/11/2018 :  18:50:42  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
Hi Sangamesh

Can you simply email me a pdf?

Thanks
Dan Heffern
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Send Topic to a Friend
 Printer Friendly
| More
Jump To:
Cerambycoidea Forum © 2000-08 Snitz Communications Go To Top Of Page
Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.07