| Author |
 Topic  |
|
|
Bennyboymothman
Member Rosenbergia
United Kingdom
1646 Posts |
 Posted - 01/02/2022 : 20:45:59
|
336.45 KB
Another specimen I found in my collection i've never seen reference to.
Data: 12-2018 - Nowra - New South Wales - Australia
Thank you |
|
|
Gontran
Member Rosenbergia
Canada
1150 Posts |
Posted - 01/02/2022 : 21:39:43
|
| Ancita sp.....Probably crocogaster (Boisduval), Rhodopinini. Maybe the names have changed. |
Gontran |
 |
|
|
Gontran
Member Rosenbergia
Canada
1150 Posts |
Posted - 01/02/2022 : 21:46:27
|
Indeed, in Titan now Hebecerus crocogaster (Boisduval, 1835) Ancitini.
But I have more specimens in my collection with the same name, but quite different species to me. ? |
Gontran |
|
|
|
Bennyboymothman
Member Rosenbergia
United Kingdom
1646 Posts |
Posted - 03/02/2022 : 21:24:39
|
| Thank you Gontran! |
|
|
|
Francesco
Forum Admin
Luxembourg
9454 Posts |
Posted - 13/03/2022 : 10:43:41
|
quote:
Originally posted by Gontran
Indeed, in Titan now Hebecerus crocogaster (Boisduval, 1835) Ancitini.
Yes, someone rehabilited Hebecerus Dejean, but it is an error since this taxon is nomen nudum.
As you can see (here, p. 336) Hebecerus Dejean does not contain valid species. |
|
|
|
Gontran
Member Rosenbergia
Canada
1150 Posts |
Posted - 13/03/2022 : 13:59:42
|
| Thank you Francesco. I kept my label Ancita crocogaster (Boisduval, 1835). As for the tribe, is it Ancitini or now Desmiphorini ? |
Gontran |
|
|
|
dryobius
Member Rosenbergia
USA
1887 Posts |
Posted - 13/03/2022 : 16:38:35
|
the following is verbatim from Bousquet & Bouchard from 2013, about page 83.
Hebecerus Dejean, 1835: 336
Originally included available species: Acanthocinus australis Boisduval, 1835 (as “Australis. Dej.”); Acanthocinus marginicollis Boisduval, 1835 (as “Marginicollis. Dej.”).
Type species: Acanthocinus marginicollis Boisduval, 1835 by present designation.
Current status: senior subjective synonym of Ancita Thomson, 1864 in Cerambycidae (fide McKeown 1947: 127, as “Hebecerus Thomson”).
Comments. Hebecerus Dejean, 1835 has precedence over Ancita Thomson, 1864 and should be used as valid. Reversal of Precedence (ICZN 1999, Article 23.9) or an application to the Commission is necessary to conserve usage of the name Ancita Thomson, 1864.
Boisduval’s publication was issued by 27 March 1835 (Evenhuis 1997: 104), so the two names listed in Dejean (1835: 336), which were credited to Dejean in Boisduval’s work, were made available prior to Dejean’s publication. |
|
|
|
Francesco
Forum Admin
Luxembourg
9454 Posts |
Posted - 13/03/2022 : 17:13:36
|
Thank you!
The article can be download here.
I wonder if Hebecerus marginicollis should be cited as Dejean in Boisduval, 1835 |
|
|
|
Gontran
Member Rosenbergia
Canada
1150 Posts |
Posted - 13/03/2022 : 19:47:47
|
| Thanks for this paper. |
Gontran |
|
|
| |
Topic |
|
Australia: Hebecerus crocogaster?
