| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| Cuong Do |
Posted - 30/06/2011 : 06:13:49
Identified by Francesco! |
| 4 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| Xavier |
Posted - 06/11/2013 : 11:45:11
To compare with the type in the forum's section, it is not this species but possibily X. curticornis, Pic 19.. ? I will add type's picture after finding the original publication. |
| Francesco |
Posted - 02/02/2012 : 13:26:32
Actually, it is just X. latefasciatus latefasciatus Pic, 1936.
This species was described about specimens missing the anterior band, but is is only a variety. |
| Cuong Do |
Posted - 09/07/2011 : 14:05:57
Thanks Francesco, |
| Francesco |
Posted - 08/07/2011 : 21:50:46
One moment! I said that this species is close related to X. latefasciatus.
Actually, the true latefasciatus (from China) misses the narrow anterior yellow line, although it has similar colour, antennae and body shape.
It seems that this species was described as variety of X. curticornis, but I do not manage to find news of this species.
However, it should belong to the subgenus Xyloclytus. |
|
|
