Cerambycoidea Forum
Cerambycoidea Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
 All Forums
 Generalities
 Scientific questions
 Agapanthia cardui / suturalis

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert EmailInsert Image Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

   Insert an Image File

   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
Sergi Posted - 15/09/2019 : 17:53:20
Can anyone tell me if there is any article explaining that Agapanthia suturalis is synonymous with cardui ???

In this web explains the synonymy but I can't find the paper that explains that.

http://iberfauna.mncn.csic.es/showficha.aspx?rank=T&idtax=98433
2   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
Francesco Posted - 22/09/2019 : 07:36:59
It does results to me that these species have been put in synonymy after the revalidation of suturalis.

Nevertheless, I raised some doubts in my book of Cerambycidae from Luxembourg (here, p. 118-119):
A. cardui (s. l.) is widespread in the western Palaearctic from Spain to the Middle East.
Sama (2002) pointed out the presence of two "phenotypes", dominating in Europe (cardui = pannonica) or in the south Mediterranean (suturalis), widely coexisting and intergrading in the northern Mediterranean.
According to Švácha (2001), larvae are clearly different, but no character was added supporting this claim.
Recently, Sama (2008) evidenced that some male genital characters (aedeagus and endophallic sclerites) are the best differential characters; nevertheless, leaving a still inconclusive situation. In fact, the evidenced characters still show a patent variability that might lead to split interpretations (further species? intraspecific variability?), while the author avoided to investigate coexisting populations in order to exclude the merging of genital characters. Actually, the presence of virtually unidentifiable specimens in mixed populations suggests that the taxa are probably able to interbreed, since sibling species tend to accentuate their differences in overlapping areas (Brown & Wilson, 1956).


Some specimens, like this one or this one, leave doubts.
Possibly, a genetical analyses of large populations might led to clarify this situation.
Xavier Posted - 16/09/2019 : 00:17:41
In Titan database, these species are valid. Idem in Biolib.

Cerambycoidea Forum © 2000-08 Snitz Communications Go To Top Of Page
Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.07