| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| Robert |
Posted - 29/01/2013 : 08:07:45
Monochamini? |
| 6 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| Francesco |
Posted - 29/01/2013 : 19:30:43
quote:
Originally posted by dryobius
Breuning made more mistakes than I can count. 
I agree  but this objection is irrelevant in this topic... |
| dryobius |
Posted - 29/01/2013 : 19:29:01
Breuning made more mistakes than I can count. |
| Francesco |
Posted - 29/01/2013 : 18:32:31
quote:
Originally posted by dryobius
The Tribe Monochamini is what is used in the current catalogs of the Palaearctic and the New World.
Yes I know... despite this weird catalogue, this tribe was synonymised in a Worldwide monographs (Breuning, 1943-44) and nobody provided another one stating the contrary. 
That because there are no diagnostic characters in order to separate them in Worldwide scale (cf. Lingafelter & Hoebeke, 2002).
Thus, waiting for further official monographs, Lamiini = Monochamini |
| Robert |
Posted - 29/01/2013 : 17:56:56
Thank you both! |
| dryobius |
Posted - 29/01/2013 : 14:59:32
Acalolepta laevifrons (Aurivillius), based on this photo, courtesy of a colleague in Sweden
The Tribe Monochamini is what is used in the current catalogs of the Palaearctic and the New World. |
| Francesco |
Posted - 29/01/2013 : 12:49:39
Lamiini: Acalolepta
I do not know why somebody keeps using "Monochamini", which has no grounds. |
