T O P I C R E V I E W |
Robert |
Posted - 29/01/2013 : 08:07:45 ![](/public/imgforum/Robert/20131298650_Borneo 39.JPG)
Monochamini? |
6 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
Francesco |
Posted - 29/01/2013 : 19:30:43 quote: Originally posted by dryobius
Breuning made more mistakes than I can count. ![](images/icon_smile.gif)
I agree but this objection is irrelevant in this topic... |
dryobius |
Posted - 29/01/2013 : 19:29:01 Breuning made more mistakes than I can count. ![](images/icon_smile.gif) |
Francesco |
Posted - 29/01/2013 : 18:32:31 quote: Originally posted by dryobius The Tribe Monochamini is what is used in the current catalogs of the Palaearctic and the New World. ![](images/icon_smile.gif)
Yes I know... despite this weird catalogue, this tribe was synonymised in a Worldwide monographs (Breuning, 1943-44) and nobody provided another one stating the contrary. ![](images/icon_smile_wink.gif)
That because there are no diagnostic characters in order to separate them in Worldwide scale (cf. Lingafelter & Hoebeke, 2002). Thus, waiting for further official monographs, Lamiini = Monochamini |
Robert |
Posted - 29/01/2013 : 17:56:56 Thank you both! |
dryobius |
Posted - 29/01/2013 : 14:59:32 Acalolepta laevifrons (Aurivillius), based on this photo, courtesy of a colleague in Sweden
The Tribe Monochamini is what is used in the current catalogs of the Palaearctic and the New World. ![](images/icon_smile.gif) |
Francesco |
Posted - 29/01/2013 : 12:49:39 Lamiini: Acalolepta
I do not know why somebody keeps using "Monochamini", which has no grounds.![](images/icon_smile_disapprove.gif) |