T O P I C R E V I E W |
Vitali |
Posted - 25/01/2014 : 21:44:12 369.98 KB
This beetle is probably Xenohammus bimaculatus Schwarzer, 1931, but the black spot seems somehow very large. What do you think? |
4 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
Vitali |
Posted - 26/01/2014 : 13:17:57 That obviously means that like Francesco's beetle here mine is also Xenohammus nigromaculatus (Pic, 1926). The same locality as well. |
Vitali |
Posted - 26/01/2014 : 13:06:07 Excellent! My beetle originates from Guangxi, a province adjacent to Tonkin. |
Francesco |
Posted - 26/01/2014 : 11:32:42 Xenohammus nigromaculatus (Pic, 1926), described from Tonkin, might correspond to this specimen better than bimaculatus (described from Taiwan). |
Xavier |
Posted - 26/01/2014 : 08:49:00 Hello, I see the same problem as the 2 specimens of this topic : which one is a true X.bimaculatus Schw. ?? |