| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| kafelan |
Posted - 21/03/2016 : 00:32:56
114.26 KB
Gnoma sp.
LAOS North, Phongsali
Ban Muang-Ou-Tai
Gnoma luzonica Erichson 1834 vs Trichognoma chinensis Breuning, 1956 |
| 10 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| Xavier |
Posted - 11/06/2017 : 18:24:10
 |
| MONO |
Posted - 11/06/2017 : 18:17:25
Thanks, Xavier!
I will keep my eye out for Trichognoma chinensis |
| Xavier |
Posted - 10/06/2017 : 13:44:21
245.97 KB
Trichognoma chinensis Breuning, 1956 ; illustration from BREUNING S., 1956. Lamiaires nouveaux de la collection Lepesme (2e note). Longicornia III: 665-702 |
| MONO |
Posted - 09/06/2017 : 16:24:00
Trichognoma chinensis is very mysterious (Distribution: Province Zhejiang£¬China)£¬ has anybody seen it? |
| Francesco |
Posted - 22/02/2017 : 17:02:10
Gnoma luzonica luzonica Erichson, 1834. |
| kafelan |
Posted - 24/03/2016 : 14:36:36
Sorry, correct location:
Philippines, Baco Mindoro South Luzon |
| Francesco |
Posted - 23/03/2016 : 07:55:39
I do not think, Trichognoma should be a taxon covered by hairs.
The locality is surely wrong.
|
| kafelan |
Posted - 22/03/2016 : 23:37:05
It may be location error.
I have such location data. Can it be Trichognoma chinensis Breuning, 1956 (palearctic)? |
| Gerard |
Posted - 21/03/2016 : 20:44:22
Pour moi c'est bien Gnoma luzonica Erichson, 1834.
Mais la localité est fausse, il n'y a pas de Gnoma dans la région Indochinoise.  |
| Xavier |
Posted - 21/03/2016 : 19:57:04
Are you sure your specimen comes from Laos ? apparently, no Gnoma species in Laos. |
