| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| Xavier |
Posted - 23/09/2012 : 16:06:06
19 mm. Hua Phan, nord Laos.
Les 2 tubercules post-basaux m'amènent au genre Mutatocoptops; ensuite, dans Gressitt (1970), il n'y a que Mutatocoptops alboapicalis Pic, 1925, que j'ai du mal à reconnaitre ici ou sur la photo de Francesco.
= The 2 bumps lead me to genus Mutatocoptops; but in Gressitt(1970), There is only Mutatocoptops alboapicalis Pic, 1925, which I do not recognize here or on Francesco picture |
| 15 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| SDevesa |
Posted - 26/08/2024 : 19:58:28
Thank you, Olivier. These are the data received with the specimens. I'm going to check all the specimens in my collection from the same locality.
You are right: I just found that it is from Xekong Province in Laos.
Thanks again
Saludos
Sergio |
| znort |
Posted - 26/08/2024 : 03:59:30
Hi Sergio, for me Phou Phien Kha Sieng is not a chinese data but more probably from Laos like in this publication from Alain Drumont. New contribution to the knowledge of the genus Vietetropis Komiya, 1997 with the description of a new species from the Guangxi province in southern China. |
| Xavier |
Posted - 25/08/2024 : 12:26:23
The fauna of southern Yunnan is almost identical to that of northern Laos, no border for longhorn beetles  |
| SDevesa |
Posted - 25/08/2024 : 11:12:24
Yes, I have read it. But my doubt is about the size and shape of the size and shape of the prominent elytral ridges: they are quite different in my 2 specimens. It means it is a very variable and Yamasako&Chou says "relatively rudimentary and obtuse in G. laosica".
My other "doubt" was about the distribution area. I know it is a weak argument, but if so it will be expanded from China (Yunnan) to Thayland (Chiang Mai), noy only Laos.
Says that, I believe they are females of G. laosica.
Thank you for your help and patience.
Saludos
Sergio |
| Xavier |
Posted - 24/08/2024 : 12:30:03
Salut Sergio, did you read Yamasako & Chou, 2018 ? |
| SDevesa |
Posted - 24/08/2024 : 11:26:19
Sorry to introduce this discusion again after so long time, but I still have some doubts...
Here I show 2 specimens: the first one is from Mt. Phou Phien Kha Sieng, Yunnan, China. Total Length: 21,5 mm
499.13 KB
467.2 KB
Second one is from Chiang Mai, Thailand. Total Length: 20,0 mm
479.09 KB
398.53 KB
Do they have the same species?. Do they are Gibbomesosella laosica Breuning, 1969?
Saludos
Sergio |
| Gerard |
Posted - 25/08/2019 : 17:57:02
Je rajoute cette photo pour confirmé
Gibbomesosella laosica Breuning, 1969
Identifié grâce a la publication,
Junsuke Yamasako 1) and Wen-I Chou, 2018 A New Species of Gibbomesosella from Taiwan (Coleoptera,
Cerambycidae, Lamiinae, Pteropliini)
260.36 KB |
| Xavier |
Posted - 25/08/2019 : 17:49:39
A la lecture de Yamasako & Chou, 2018 , il s'agit très probablement de Gibbomesosella laosica Breuning, 1969. |
| Xavier |
Posted - 03/01/2017 : 13:19:38
Cette espèce est très probablement nouvelle : le post a été vu plus de 1300 fois, et personne ne propose d'identification...
j'ajoute un mâle (même localité):
227.76 KB |
| Xavier |
Posted - 19/12/2016 : 17:22:54
Je remonte ce post, car cette énorme Pteropliini n'a toujours pas de nom, ce qui ne cesse de m'étonner. Pourrait-elle appartenir à un genre proche de celui-ci? |
| Xavier |
Posted - 13/04/2016 : 20:28:03
Très intéressante suggestion !... |
| jplami |
Posted - 13/04/2016 : 20:13:38
Bizarre, j'ai de suite pensé à un Pteropliini du genre Daxata proche de confusa... |
| Xavier |
Posted - 12/04/2016 : 08:44:21
178.36 KB
It should be the female (same location). |
| Xavier |
Posted - 12/04/2016 : 08:35:05
113.09 KB
It is not this species...
Any more idea ? |
| Xaurus |
Posted - 01/02/2015 : 23:32:25
yes ok, generally I think for worldwide scientific communications the english language is usefull and practically, the use of a translater is no problem but I lost time. |
