Cerambycoidea Forum
Cerambycoidea Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
 All Forums
 Cerambycidae Lamiinae
 Pteropliini
 Vietnam: Synixais strandi

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert EmailInsert Image Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

   Insert an Image File

   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
Andre Posted - 25/05/2013 : 12:17:52

55.52 KB

N - Vietnam, Cao Bang Prov.,
Female, 11 mm.
15   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
Xavier Posted - 08/03/2014 : 17:11:36
Dear Xaurus,
I think is ok now .
Thank you
Xaurus Posted - 08/03/2014 : 13:10:20
Dear Xavier,

the fig 23c in the book is the true Sesiosa laosensis a quite different genus to Synixais, the problem there is no type picture from Sesiosa laosensis available, probably in the Bishop Museum the HT is'nt labeled, and his type label is put under a spm of Synixais notaticollis (=strand). Is a bit confused, I hope you can understand.
Xavier Posted - 07/03/2014 : 09:07:29
Dear xaurus,
- I know that the 23c picture is a wrong label in Laos Fauna (and it's not our probleme here), but tell me please the difference between Sesiosa laosensis and Synixais strandi : I don't see it

Xaurus Posted - 07/03/2014 : 00:09:00
Ok, the pict. 23c is Sesiosa laosensis (wrong label) and both Synixais strandi and S. notaticollis are synonym, I have seen a bigger series in the coll. of CH, and your spms Xavier should belong to S. strandi too.
Xavier Posted - 06/03/2014 : 19:17:00
We had a similar discussion here. What do you think my species is ?

Here the 2 pictures from Laos fauna (Gressitt). * Note that the picture 23c for "S. strandi" doesn't exist in this book .

22d "Sesiosa laosensis"

23b "Synixai notaticollis "

What is the main difference between this 2 species ?


Xaurus Posted - 06/03/2014 : 18:02:57
Hallo Xavier,
the situation is really quite confused: the real Sesiosa laosensis is pictured at the Fig. 23c in the Laos book, and the Fig. 22d is Synixais strandi - the type spm in the Bishop Museum contains the wrong label, and therefore Ohbayashi's pictures is wrong titeled as Sesiosa laosensis.
S. strandi and notaticollis are the same!
Xavier Posted - 05/03/2014 : 16:07:38
Well, for me it's unclear : I have the types pictures of both species, and I don't see any difference between Sesiolsa laosensis and Synixais notaticollis ! Exactly the same pattern, pubescence, etc. What must be seen ?

...or could it be also synonyms ???
Xaurus Posted - 05/03/2014 : 12:41:48
Now its clear, our spms from N-Vietnam are: Synixais strandi Breuning, 1940 (= S. notaticollis Breuning, 1964), the black band is quite variable ..
Xaurus Posted - 25/12/2013 : 23:55:44
I have 2 spms (male ,female) from this origin, in female the black transverse band is broken in the middle, so I think this is a variable feature, and therefore the same sps nearly sure.
Andre Posted - 24/12/2013 : 13:16:08
hmmmmm.....I have 1 Male and 1 Female from Pia Oak, with more or less the same toment.
Hallo Xaurus.....have you also spec. from this place?
Xavier Posted - 24/12/2013 : 12:53:43
Right, I understand now.
I have seen the different medial band, but I feel that it's a possible variation. The habitus, the antennal structure is quite the same . But that's only my feeling.
Xavier Posted - 24/12/2013 : 10:37:07
Das Vieh ? What does it mean ?
Xaurus Posted - 24/12/2013 : 01:32:42
Das Vieh sieht wirklich der Sesiosa laosensis sehr ähnlich, und wird es wohl auch sein, nur die mittlere Binde ist eben anders.
Xavier Posted - 21/12/2013 : 17:12:22
By looking to the picture of the type (I will add it later), it's probably Sesiosa laosensis Breuning, 1968
Francesco Posted - 29/05/2013 : 07:20:54
Das gehört zu Synixais (Pteropliini), wahrscheinlich eine neue Art.
Kuck mal die verstecke Abteilung des Forums.

Cerambycoidea Forum © 2000-08 Snitz Communications Go To Top Of Page
Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.07