T O P I C R E V I E W |
Andre |
Posted - 25/05/2013 : 12:17:52 55.52 KB
N - Vietnam, Cao Bang Prov., Female, 11 mm. |
15 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
Xavier |
Posted - 08/03/2014 : 17:11:36 Dear Xaurus, I think is ok now . Thank you |
Xaurus |
Posted - 08/03/2014 : 13:10:20 Dear Xavier,
the fig 23c in the book is the true Sesiosa laosensis a quite different genus to Synixais, the problem there is no type picture from Sesiosa laosensis available, probably in the Bishop Museum the HT is'nt labeled, and his type label is put under a spm of Synixais notaticollis (=strand). Is a bit confused, I hope you can understand.
|
Xavier |
Posted - 07/03/2014 : 09:07:29 Dear xaurus, - I know that the 23c picture is a wrong label in Laos Fauna (and it's not our probleme here), but tell me please the difference between Sesiosa laosensis and Synixais strandi : I don't see it
|
Xaurus |
Posted - 07/03/2014 : 00:09:00 Ok, the pict. 23c is Sesiosa laosensis (wrong label) and both Synixais strandi and S. notaticollis are synonym, I have seen a bigger series in the coll. of CH, and your spms Xavier should belong to S. strandi too.
|
Xavier |
Posted - 06/03/2014 : 19:17:00 We had a similar discussion here. What do you think my species is ?
Here the 2 pictures from Laos fauna (Gressitt). * Note that the picture 23c for "S. strandi" doesn't exist in this book .
22d "Sesiosa laosensis" 23b "Synixai notaticollis "
What is the main difference between this 2 species ?
|
Xaurus |
Posted - 06/03/2014 : 18:02:57 Hallo Xavier, the situation is really quite confused: the real Sesiosa laosensis is pictured at the Fig. 23c in the Laos book, and the Fig. 22d is Synixais strandi - the type spm in the Bishop Museum contains the wrong label, and therefore Ohbayashi's pictures is wrong titeled as Sesiosa laosensis. S. strandi and notaticollis are the same! |
Xavier |
Posted - 05/03/2014 : 16:07:38 Well, for me it's unclear : I have the types pictures of both species, and I don't see any difference between Sesiolsa laosensis and Synixais notaticollis ! Exactly the same pattern, pubescence, etc. What must be seen ?
...or could it be also synonyms ??? |
Xaurus |
Posted - 05/03/2014 : 12:41:48 Now its clear, our spms from N-Vietnam are: Synixais strandi Breuning, 1940 (= S. notaticollis Breuning, 1964), the black band is quite variable ..
|
Xaurus |
Posted - 25/12/2013 : 23:55:44 I have 2 spms (male ,female) from this origin, in female the black transverse band is broken in the middle, so I think this is a variable feature, and therefore the same sps nearly sure. |
Andre |
Posted - 24/12/2013 : 13:16:08 hmmmmm.....I have 1 Male and 1 Female from Pia Oak, with more or less the same toment. Hallo Xaurus.....have you also spec. from this place? |
Xavier |
Posted - 24/12/2013 : 12:53:43 Right, I understand now. I have seen the different medial band, but I feel that it's a possible variation. The habitus, the antennal structure is quite the same . But that's only my feeling. |
Xavier |
Posted - 24/12/2013 : 10:37:07 Das Vieh ? What does it mean ? |
Xaurus |
Posted - 24/12/2013 : 01:32:42 Das Vieh sieht wirklich der Sesiosa laosensis sehr ähnlich, und wird es wohl auch sein, nur die mittlere Binde ist eben anders. |
Xavier |
Posted - 21/12/2013 : 17:12:22 By looking to the picture of the type (I will add it later), it's probably Sesiosa laosensis Breuning, 1968 |
Francesco |
Posted - 29/05/2013 : 07:20:54 Das gehört zu Synixais (Pteropliini), wahrscheinlich eine neue Art. Kuck mal die verstecke Abteilung des Forums. |