T O P I C R E V I E W |
Zhu |
Posted - 22/12/2008 : 07:05:07
Dear Dr. Vitali: Sorry to bother you again. Last time you help id. the Trigonoptera species. This time we Chinese quarantiners intercepted an unusual large lamininae beetle, long about 4 cm. Could you pls help identify this seemingly economically important one? |
5 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
Zhu |
Posted - 25/12/2008 : 02:16:06 Thank you for the very useful tips though I have noticed that the antenna scape is smooth on the Phryneta while the Lamiini is ridged at the apex. However, I have no idea that character is the key to seperate. |
Francesco |
Posted - 24/12/2008 : 17:01:46 Yes, Lamiinae are in a very confusing situation, partially also due to the great number of species... Nonetheless, Lamiini (as Dihammus or Epepeotes) are distinguishable for a ridge on the apex of the first antennal joint, while Phrynetini are deprived of it. Under other aspects they are actually very similar... Thank you for the news: Gabon was not among the already recorded localities, though it is located in the areal of this species. |
Zhu |
Posted - 24/12/2008 : 02:24:41 Sorry, it is from Africa, Gabon. I was too excited when I see the big beetle. |
Zhu |
Posted - 24/12/2008 : 02:17:30 That is so great. It could have taken me for months to identify this kind of beetle. First I thought it might be Dihammus, or Epepeotes, or what ever... But none seems to match with the specimen. What is it, there is so many confused Laminines. I felt like see it once, but I lost it somewhere.I have many other specimens from Africa and PNG, I will post later. But wait a minuter, this seem to only live in Africa,but my colleague told me to find it on PNG logs,they must make mistake,right? |
Francesco |
Posted - 23/12/2008 : 18:28:05 Dear Colleague, I am always happy to hear you. This beetle seems to me Phryneta leprosa (Fabricius, 1775), a species that is also present in the gallery. This species has a large African distribution and it has already been introduced in Malta since 2003, where it attacks cultivated broadleaf-trees. It is also mentioned as pest in this official document. |
|
|