T O P I C R E V I E W |
Vitali |
Posted - 07/05/2013 : 09:46:53 I have a problem with the following species:
![](/public/imgforum/Vitali/20135792258_IMG_9117.JPG) 415.01 KB
It looks identical to the beetle here, which is named Thylactus chinensis Kriesche, 1924.
In the Iconography of Chinese Cerambycidae, a completely different beetle is shown under such name. Please. have a look at the picture below.
![](/public/imgforum/Vitali/20135793641_Thylactus chinensis_Icon.jpg) 15.79 KB
Which of the beetles has a wrong name? The one in the Iconography has antennae and alytra tips almost identical to those in Thylactus simulans. |
4 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
Francesco |
Posted - 21/05/2014 : 09:40:29
![](images/icon_smile.gif) |
Vitali |
Posted - 21/05/2014 : 09:35:49 After clarifying the question here, we should probably change the name to Thylactus densepunctatus Chiang & Li, 1984 also in this add. |
Francesco |
Posted - 07/06/2013 : 20:03:31 Your intuition is right Vitali: Thylactus simulans are both Fig. 1384 and 1386 of the Iconography of Chinese Cerambycidae.![](images/icon_smile_sad.gif) |
nalslan |
Posted - 08/05/2013 : 04:35:05 It is probably another misplace in the Iconography book. I found on the same page you mentioned in that book, there are at least two misplaces, the image of no. 1383 is a Paraglenea fortunei, not Thyestilla gebleri, and the image for no. 1390 is not Uraecha angusta. |