Cerambycoidea Forum
Cerambycoidea Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
 All Forums
 Cerambycidae Lamiinae
 Xylorhizini
 China, Thylactus densepunctatus

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert EmailInsert Image Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

   Insert an Image File

   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
Vitali Posted - 07/05/2013 : 09:46:53
I have a problem with the following species:


415.01 KB

It looks identical to the beetle here, which is named Thylactus chinensis Kriesche, 1924.

In the Iconography of Chinese Cerambycidae, a completely different beetle is shown under such name.
Please. have a look at the picture below.


15.79 KB

Which of the beetles has a wrong name?
The one in the Iconography has antennae and alytra tips almost identical to those in Thylactus simulans.
4   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
Francesco Posted - 21/05/2014 : 09:40:29
Vitali Posted - 21/05/2014 : 09:35:49
After clarifying the question here, we should probably change the name to Thylactus densepunctatus Chiang & Li, 1984 also in this add.
Francesco Posted - 07/06/2013 : 20:03:31
Your intuition is right Vitali: Thylactus simulans are both Fig. 1384 and 1386 of the Iconography of Chinese Cerambycidae.
nalslan Posted - 08/05/2013 : 04:35:05
It is probably another misplace in the Iconography book.
I found on the same page you mentioned in that book, there are at least two misplaces, the image of no. 1383 is a Paraglenea fortunei, not Thyestilla gebleri, and the image for no. 1390 is not Uraecha angusta.

Cerambycoidea Forum © 2000-08 Snitz Communications Go To Top Of Page
Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.07