| Author |
 Topic  |
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
France
12076 Posts |
 Posted - 16/12/2012 : 13:16:03
|
| On doit donc l'appeler Chlorophorus, non ? |
 |
|
|
Robert
Member Rosenbergia
Canada
1242 Posts |
Posted - 16/12/2012 : 21:09:24
|
Techniquement, oui, Xavier.
Mais seulement si il n'y a eu aucune nouvelle combinaison de publiée pour réattacher ce taxon à Xylotrechus. Je ne sais pas si Dauber a publié quelque chose là-dessus. Si ça doit être fait, je crois que ça lui revient de le faire.
Robert |
Robert V. |
Edited by - Robert on 16/12/2012 21:10:09 |
|
|
|
dryobius
Member Rosenbergia
USA
1885 Posts |
Posted - 21/12/2012 : 15:16:42
|
I have an up-to-date unpublished catalogue of Cerambycoidea of Borneo in which I refer to this as Xylotrechus decoratus.
That may be "technically" incorrect.
This species, and others, may be closer to Xylotrechus than they are to Chlorophorus, or maybe not!
The Clytini of Southeast Asia are incredibly diverse, and in need of revisions.
As long as you have the correct species name " decoratus ", you should feel satisfied, as it is really the most important part of the name!
 |
|
|
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
France
12076 Posts |
Posted - 21/12/2012 : 18:25:17
|
| Welcome Dan ! I am glad to see a specialist like you on this forum. |
|
|
|
Topic |
|
Borneo, Chlorophorus: decoratus ♀
