| Author |
 Topic  |
|
|
loongfah
Member Purpuricenus
Singapore
374 Posts |
 Posted - 01/04/2013 : 11:11:17
|
394.5 KB
Not sure what this is? |
Edited by - Xavier on 28/01/2016 11:19:12 |
|
|
Beckey
Member Rosalia
Japan
553 Posts |
Posted - 01/04/2013 : 13:35:01
|
| It might be Daxata ustulata Pascoe, 1866, but I'm not sure. |
 |
|
|
loongfah
Member Purpuricenus
Singapore
374 Posts |
Posted - 01/04/2013 : 17:13:56
|
Attached is the illustration by Pascoe of Daxata ustulata
114.53 KB
Other than the color difference which could be due to the freshness of the pubescence, there are few points of structural difference. According to the description and the illustration:
1) at the base of elytra, there are a few shining granules and two elevated lines, the innermost simulating a crest; (the elevated lines are lacking in my specimen)
2) behind the shoulder the elytron is slightly bowed and marked with a dark-brown longitudinal patch; this bowed feature is less distinct in my specimen.
There is another Daxata (Taxada) sumatrensis Breuning,1961, and a Daxata confusa Pascoe,1869. I have Pascoe's description of D. confusa. It doesn't seem to be the one either. |
|
|
|
dryobius
Member Rosenbergia
USA
1887 Posts |
Posted - 01/04/2013 : 21:33:22
|
Pascoe's illustrations are not reliable.
Breuning's keys are not reliable.
383.98 KB |
|
|
|
Robert
Member Rosenbergia
Canada
1249 Posts |
Posted - 01/04/2013 : 21:49:41
|
Dan, if I go by your picture's name, the specimen you posted is Daxata ustulata, type, from BMNH.
It is clearer to have the name associated.  |
Robert V. |
|
|
|
dryobius
Member Rosenbergia
USA
1887 Posts |
Posted - 01/04/2013 : 23:02:43
|
| sorry, I forgot to add it. yes, it is the holotype from the BMNH |
|
|
| |
Topic |
|
From Singapore: Daxata (Taxada) ustulata
