Author |
Topic ![Next Topic Next Topic](images/icon_go_right.gif) |
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif)
France
12092 Posts |
Posted - 16/04/2014 : 07:57:02
|
![](/public/imgforum/Xavier/201441675126_Prothema copier.jpg) North-East Laos.Same locality.
I post again these species, searching for their id. I've got series of both specimen ; yellow band are not a sexual dimorphism.
If one of them could be Prothema coomani Pic, 1934 (but which one ??), what is the second one ? |
Edited by - Xavier on 02/01/2018 11:00:42 |
|
horshehden
Member Purpuricenus
![](images/icon_star_red.gif) ![](images/icon_star_red.gif)
Czech Republic
424 Posts |
Posted - 07/02/2015 : 13:32:49
|
None of them, I'm afraid. |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif)
France
12092 Posts |
Posted - 07/02/2015 : 15:20:07
|
What do you think exactly ? ![](images/icon_smile_wink.gif) |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif)
France
12092 Posts |
Posted - 08/02/2015 : 11:25:48
|
quote: Originally posted by horshehden
None of them, I'm afraid.
So, could you tell me what is a true P.coomani ? |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
horshehden
Member Purpuricenus
![](images/icon_star_red.gif) ![](images/icon_star_red.gif)
Czech Republic
424 Posts |
Posted - 08/02/2015 : 14:57:38
|
If I remember it well, there are just two bands - located similarly to both your specimens, but their shape looks more like in P. cakli, P. astutum or P. similie (obviously, except the apical part, which is without any band in P. coomani). |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif)
France
12092 Posts |
Posted - 08/02/2015 : 16:09:37
|
ok, if you can provide a picture of one, it would be wonderful , because I don't see what you mean... |
Edited by - Xavier on 08/02/2015 16:12:24 |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif)
France
12092 Posts |
Posted - 09/02/2015 : 09:28:51
|
Picture 23h from Gressitt & Rondon (1970) : "Prothema signata Pasc."
-Prothema signata Pasc. is another species, with male black, without any light band.
- I think that my specimen with yellow bands and Gressitt specimen belong to the same species, possibly new. (First band not touching the scutellum)
-I still don't know what is specimen with white bands.
Tom has sent me a picture of Prothema coomani Pic (may be the type ?), which is another species. |
Edited by - Xavier on 09/02/2015 09:30:18 |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif)
France
12092 Posts |
Posted - 02/01/2018 : 10:59:38
|
Le spécimen n°1 est Prothema vulgare Holzschuh, 2017. Le spécimen n°2 est Prothema x-fasciatum Holzschuh, 2017. |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
|
Topic ![Next Topic Next Topic](images/icon_go_right.gif) |
|