Cerambycoidea Forum
Cerambycoidea Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Cerambycidae Lamiinae
 Dorcaschematini
 Thailand: ? Cylindrepomus fouqueti
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Send Topic to a Friend
 Printer Friendly
| More
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

Capitaine
Scientific Collaborator

France
1840 Posts

Posted - 25/01/2016 :  17:09:28  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote

130.06 KB

I'm not sure for this one from Lampang / 11mm, Olenecamptus sp ?

Claude

Edited by - Xavier on 08/06/2020 08:28:31

Xavier
Scientific Collaborator

France
12201 Posts

Posted - 26/01/2016 :  11:19:59  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
It is a Dorcaschematini, but I do not find it. Hard group.

Edited by - Xavier on 26/01/2016 11:20:21
Go to Top of Page

Capitaine
Scientific Collaborator

France
1840 Posts

Posted - 26/01/2016 :  14:25:29  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
Merci Xavier, en faisant une recherche plus approfondie sur la base de Jean-Philippe et sur le net, j'ai réussi à éliminer 4 des 5 espèces de Thailande. Reste donc Olenecamptus diversemaculatus (Breuning, 1938).

Claude
Go to Top of Page

Jaguarito
Member Purpuricenus

France
145 Posts

Posted - 26/01/2016 :  15:28:49  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
Je vais probablement dire une bêtise, car je ne connais pas divermaculatus (pas plus que compressipes, d'ailleurs), mais je lui trouve une petite allure d'Olenecamptus fouqueti (à 1 mm près).
Par ailleurs, est-il bien certain qu'il n'y ait que cinq espèces en Thaïlande ?

Edited by - Jaguarito on 26/01/2016 15:29:30
Go to Top of Page

Xavier
Scientific Collaborator

France
12201 Posts

Posted - 26/01/2016 :  16:19:11  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote

114.46 KB

L'illustration de Breuning est assez éloignée de la bête postée, mais la description colle plutôt bien (tache blanche longitudinale sur le côté du pronotum, rides de celui-ci, couleur rouge, etc).

Titan ne mentionne que 2 Olenecamptus de Thaïlande, ce qui ne correspond qu'aux deux seules mentions faunistiques publiées pour ce pays. Plusieurs espèces (ne serait-ce que O. bilobus) des pays limitrophes sont probablement à ajouter (qui s'y colle ??).
Go to Top of Page

Capitaine
Scientific Collaborator

France
1840 Posts

Posted - 26/01/2016 :  17:28:08  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
Tu as probablement raison pour le nombre existant en Thailande, je me suis basé sur la base (en général très complète) de jean-Philippe et j'ai éliminé compressipes en supposant que la dénomination se rapporte à une différence morphologique des pattes (ou tarses) que je n'ai pas remarquée sur mon spécimen.Par contre, je n'ai pas trouvé de "fouqueti" dans cette liste ?

Claude
Go to Top of Page

Xavier
Scientific Collaborator

France
12201 Posts

Posted - 26/01/2016 :  17:53:50  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
parce qu'il a changé de genre : Cylindrepomus fouqueti (Pic, 1932)
Go to Top of Page

Jaguarito
Member Purpuricenus

France
145 Posts

Posted - 26/01/2016 :  21:20:50  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
Ah bon, s'ils se sont amusés à changer de genre, c'est normal que j'y perde mon compte !
Go to Top of Page

Xavier
Scientific Collaborator

France
12201 Posts

Posted - 26/01/2016 :  22:53:31  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
so, Olenecamptus diversemaculatus Breuning, 1938 ?
Go to Top of Page

sangamesh
Member Purpuricenus

India
426 Posts

Posted - 01/02/2017 :  10:54:02  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
Following Dillon and Dillon (1948), the specimen correspond well to Olenecamptus fouqueti, with respect to the presence of triangular spot each side of middle on the vertex, pronotal disc with ovate spot each side which is not reaching neither apical nor basal margins and also characteristic white spots on elytra...however, why is it included in Cylindrepomus genus like here and here...considering the possibility of referring the last published literature for enlisting synonyms in quoted databases, it may be obvivious that enlisiting fouqueti under Cylindrepomus was after the Rondon and Breuning (1970)...however Rondon and Breuning (1970) seems to have ignored the work of Dillon and Dillon (1948) while including the fouqueti...or was there any nomenclature act regarding this aspect of including fouqueti under Cylindrepomus
Go to Top of Page

Xaurus
Member Rosenbergia

Germany
1922 Posts

Posted - 08/06/2020 :  00:28:40  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
Pic described fouqueti in the genus Olenecamptus and that is still valid Maybe the entry in Titanbase goes back to Breuning (1940): Nov. Ent., page 539 he list the sps under the genus Cylindrepomus but without any nomencl. act for a new comb. or I don't know any more recent paper made this changing.
Go to Top of Page

Xavier
Scientific Collaborator

France
12201 Posts

Posted - 08/06/2020 :  07:54:10  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
In Breuning(1940)- Dorcaschematini
– page 533, Breuning wrote that Cylindrepomus laosensis Breuning, 1936 is a synonym of Olenecamptus Fouqueti Pic, 1932 ; then Breuning wrote that Pic' species is a Cylindrepomus.
- page 539 (description of the species) : same thing ( synonymy, and genus change)

In Dillon & Dillon ( 1948) page 206:

38.24 KB

To complete: Breuning original description (1936), which should be the same in the french revision(1940).


127.58 KB
BREUNING S., 1936. Novae species Cerambycidarum. V.

Edited by - Xavier on 08/06/2020 08:45:07
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Send Topic to a Friend
 Printer Friendly
| More
Jump To:
Cerambycoidea Forum © 2000-08 Snitz Communications Go To Top Of Page
Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.07