Author |
Topic ![Next Topic Next Topic](images/icon_go_right.gif) |
|
Sergi
Member Rosenbergia
![](images/icon_star_blue.gif) ![](images/icon_star_blue.gif) ![](images/icon_star_blue.gif) ![](images/icon_star_blue.gif)
Spain
1741 Posts |
Posted - 09/12/2016 : 18:22:41
|
Can anybody explain (better if add keys or pictures) to separate Chlorophorus glaucus, glabromaculatus and pilosus???
Thank you very much! |
|
Francesco
Forum Admin
![](images/icon_star_gold.gif) ![](images/icon_star_gold.gif) ![](images/icon_star_gold.gif) ![](images/icon_star_gold.gif) ![](images/icon_star_gold.gif)
Luxembourg
9416 Posts |
Posted - 09/12/2016 : 18:37:11
|
According to Sama, who claimed to have seen the type of Leptura pilosa, this species belongs to Vadonia unipunctata (a black form). This synonym was not made official yet (in this case, it will affect on the ssp. occidentalis).
The valid name of C. pilosus Auct is, consequently, C. glabromaculatus. According to Sama, the forms showing grey females (and yellow males, actually identical to glabromaculatus) should be referred to Callidium glaucum Fabricius, 1781... a very problematic statment, since this species was described from... India! ![](images/icon_smile_shock.gif)
Always according to Sama, these two forms are two different species, since both present in Sardinia and Provence... actually, both found in the international harbors of Cagliari and Marseille. Evidently, Sama ignores completely the well-known introduction of this species in foreign countries.![](images/icon_smile_blush.gif)
This topic, already published in my PhD-Thesis, will be published in a book concerning the Cerambycidae of Luxembourg in spring. |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
Sergi
Member Rosenbergia
![](images/icon_star_blue.gif) ![](images/icon_star_blue.gif) ![](images/icon_star_blue.gif) ![](images/icon_star_blue.gif)
Spain
1741 Posts |
Posted - 09/12/2016 : 18:46:59
|
Ok Francesco! thank you very much for your reply!!
I'll wait for your book until next spring!!!![](images/icon_smile_big.gif) |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
znort
Member Purpuricenus
![](images/icon_star_red.gif) ![](images/icon_star_red.gif)
China
481 Posts |
Posted - 05/02/2017 : 06:37:02
|
Francesco, tu peux ajouter à cela le fait que glabromaculatus n'a visiblement pas de localité typique et que la dérivatio nominis de glabromaculatus sous-entend des macules glabres. Critère qui semble avoir été depuis totalement négligé. Mais j'imagine aisément que tu l'a relevé. |
Chinese Cerambycidae |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
Francesco
Forum Admin
![](images/icon_star_gold.gif) ![](images/icon_star_gold.gif) ![](images/icon_star_gold.gif) ![](images/icon_star_gold.gif) ![](images/icon_star_gold.gif)
Luxembourg
9416 Posts |
Posted - 05/02/2017 : 10:49:13
|
Tout à fait!
In order to complete this topic, I insert Olivier's drawing of the type of Callidium glaucus:
![](../public/imgforum/Francesco/201725104514_callidium_glaucum.JPG) Callidium glaucus from India, in Olivier, 1808, Pl. 70, Fig. 68
As you can see, this species has nothing to do with the grey subspecies of Chlorophorus glabromaculatus. None of the known varieties with grey pattern corresponds to this species.
![](../public/imgforum/Francesco/201725104841_IMG_0474.JPG) Villers, 1978 (coloured) |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
znort
Member Purpuricenus
![](images/icon_star_red.gif) ![](images/icon_star_red.gif)
China
481 Posts |
Posted - 05/02/2017 : 12:05:28
|
cela semble en effet assez évident. Un dossier digne de smei |
Chinese Cerambycidae |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
|
Topic ![Next Topic Next Topic](images/icon_go_right.gif) |
|