Cerambycoidea Forum
Cerambycoidea Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Generalities
 Scientific questions
 Chlorophorus glaucus, glabromaculatus and pilosus
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Send Topic to a Friend
 Printer Friendly
| More
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

Sergi
Member Rosenbergia

Spain
1741 Posts

Posted - 09/12/2016 :  18:22:41  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
Can anybody explain (better if add keys or pictures) to separate Chlorophorus glaucus, glabromaculatus and pilosus???

Thank you very much!

Francesco
Forum Admin

Luxembourg
9416 Posts

Posted - 09/12/2016 :  18:37:11  Show Profile  Email Poster  Visit Francesco's Homepage  Reply with Quote
According to Sama, who claimed to have seen the type of Leptura pilosa, this species belongs to Vadonia unipunctata (a black form). This synonym was not made official yet (in this case, it will affect on the ssp. occidentalis).

The valid name of C. pilosus Auct is, consequently, C. glabromaculatus.
According to Sama, the forms showing grey females (and yellow males, actually identical to glabromaculatus) should be referred to Callidium glaucum Fabricius, 1781... a very problematic statment, since this species was described from... India!

Always according to Sama, these two forms are two different species, since both present in Sardinia and Provence... actually, both found in the international harbors of Cagliari and Marseille. Evidently, Sama ignores completely the well-known introduction of this species in foreign countries.

This topic, already published in my PhD-Thesis, will be published in a book concerning the Cerambycidae of Luxembourg in spring.
Go to Top of Page

Sergi
Member Rosenbergia

Spain
1741 Posts

Posted - 09/12/2016 :  18:46:59  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
Ok Francesco! thank you very much for your reply!!

I'll wait for your book until next spring!!!
Go to Top of Page

znort
Member Purpuricenus

China
481 Posts

Posted - 05/02/2017 :  06:37:02  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
Francesco, tu peux ajouter à cela le fait que glabromaculatus n'a visiblement pas de localité typique et que la dérivatio nominis de glabromaculatus sous-entend des macules glabres. Critère qui semble avoir été depuis totalement négligé. Mais j'imagine aisément que tu l'a relevé.

Chinese Cerambycidae
Go to Top of Page

Francesco
Forum Admin

Luxembourg
9416 Posts

Posted - 05/02/2017 :  10:49:13  Show Profile  Email Poster  Visit Francesco's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Tout à fait!

In order to complete this topic, I insert Olivier's drawing of the type of Callidium glaucus:


Callidium glaucus from India, in Olivier, 1808, Pl. 70, Fig. 68

As you can see, this species has nothing to do with the grey subspecies of Chlorophorus glabromaculatus.
None of the known varieties with grey pattern corresponds to this species.


Villers, 1978 (coloured)
Go to Top of Page

znort
Member Purpuricenus

China
481 Posts

Posted - 05/02/2017 :  12:05:28  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
cela semble en effet assez évident. Un dossier digne de smei

Chinese Cerambycidae
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Send Topic to a Friend
 Printer Friendly
| More
Jump To:
Cerambycoidea Forum © 2000-08 Snitz Communications Go To Top Of Page
Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.07