T O P I C R E V I E W |
Andre |
Posted - 09/03/2013 : 12:32:40 ![](/public/imgforum/Andre/201339123227_1ceram25.jpg) 59.1 KB
Borneo Trus Madi, Male, 16mm.
With distinctly extension to meso- und metatibia. |
12 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
horshehden |
Posted - 10/03/2013 : 18:18:29 quote: Originally posted by dryobius
The fact is that the two species are different, and I will ask Holzschuh about formalizing the new status.
It is a long time ago - check Holzschuh (1999). |
Francesco |
Posted - 10/03/2013 : 17:04:58 You are right: the metatibiae are completely different! I go to change BioLib... I can consider it as "not accepted synonymy" ![](images/icon_smile_wink.gif) |
dryobius |
Posted - 10/03/2013 : 15:38:55 the titan database lists "vitticollis" under the nominate subgenus and also under "Lajoyeia" ![](images/icon_smile_sad.gif)
I thought Holzschuh published the new status of "interrupta" but maybe I have made a premature statement in my Borneo catalog. The fact is that the two species are different, and I will ask Holzschuh about formalizing the new status. |
Andre |
Posted - 10/03/2013 : 15:30:42 ![](/public/imgforum/Andre/2013310152656_1ceram8.jpg) 120.37 KB
Here a X. vitticollis / Borneo det. by A. Weigel (left site) and a Male / Borneo, determined by myself with normally legs. In Holzschuh 2005: "Beine beim Male (X. suturella) normal gebildet - wie bei vitticollis" = "Legs normally formed - alike as vitticollis". I`m sure C. Holzschuh has seen the type of the two spec. |
Francesco |
Posted - 10/03/2013 : 08:33:10 quote: Originally posted by Andre
In BioLib, X. interrupta is a synonym of vitticollis (after Gressit & Rondon, 1970).
I have noticed that the Titan Base provides the same synonymy. Have the data already been updated by new taxonomic papers? If not, I have to identify this species as vitticollis...![](images/icon_smile_shy.gif) |
Andre |
Posted - 09/03/2013 : 21:42:28 Thank you Dan, I agree with you. |
dryobius |
Posted - 09/03/2013 : 19:54:33 I have vitticollis and interrupta and they are different.
The tibiae are distinct and this would then appear to be X. interrupta. |
Andre |
Posted - 09/03/2013 : 17:55:50 In the description of X. suturella Holzschuh, 2005 (thank you Xavier!!!), this spec. is compared with vitticollis and interrupta. According to this, interrupta is marked by very kinky meso- and metatibia (male) and a small stripe after the scutellum. In BioLib, X. interrupta is a synonym of vitticollis (according to Gressit & Rondon, 1970).
![](/public/imgforum/Andre/201339175415_1ceram8.jpg) Male metatibia (sublateral). |
dryobius |
Posted - 09/03/2013 : 16:09:21 It looks to me like Xoanodera vitticollis.
I have all the Xoanodera from Sabah in my collection, and I have photographs too. X. interrupta Pic looks similar. |
Xavier |
Posted - 09/03/2013 : 13:16:10 Have a look to your boxmail and reply me ![](images/icon_smile_wink.gif) |
Andre |
Posted - 09/03/2013 : 13:04:53 Hallo Xavier, my literatur is very incomplete. Have you the PDF? |
Xavier |
Posted - 09/03/2013 : 12:49:16 There are 3 species in HOLZSCHUH Carolus, 2005, Beschreibung von neuen Bockkäfern aus SE Asien, vorwiegend aus Borneo (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae). Les Cahiers Magellanes 46: 1-40, 31 figs. Did you verify?? (me, I can't read German ) |