Cerambycoidea Forum
Cerambycoidea Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
 All Forums
 Cerambycidae Lamiinae
 Acanthocinini
 Borneo: Ostedes (s. str.) griseoapicaloides

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert EmailInsert Image Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

   Insert an Image File

   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
Larry Bezark Posted - 22/11/2015 : 03:43:35

134.8 KB

Sabah, 10 mm.
Is this a species of Ostedes?
7   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
Xavier Posted - 24/10/2019 : 09:33:36
quote:
Originally posted by dryobius

I don't think the synonymy is correct if the illustrated specimen is O. basilana Pic. For that matter, the type of O. pauperata is stated as "Aru" and the type of basilana is Basilan (Philippines).



For that matter, you are probably right: holotype picture of Ostedes basilana Pic, 1944 (here) do not fit with Ostedes pauperata Pascoe, 1859 (HT BMNH Moluques, Aru), which is a species with longer elytra, with apex different.
I think that the synonymy O. basilana / O.pauperata is wrong.

I add pictures of Ostedes basilana Pic, 1944 from Philippines in a new topic.
Larry Bezark Posted - 22/11/2015 : 19:00:23
Thanks Dan

Larry B.
dryobius Posted - 22/11/2015 : 18:55:19
Here is a better match. This is the type of O. griseoapicaloides Breuning, 1977 from MNHN.

[ Actually we should say: O. griseoapicalis Breuning, 1969 [ nec Pic, 1944 ] ]

I must thank a member of our board for providing me with this photo. I normally do not post other people's photographs without their permission, but I hope he understands that it is extremely useful in this case.


56 KB
Larry Bezark Posted - 22/11/2015 : 17:31:37
Thanks guys,

Larry B.
Xavier Posted - 22/11/2015 : 14:10:40
Yes, you might be right. Really, I do not know : I have only seen my bad picture from MNHN...
dryobius Posted - 22/11/2015 : 14:02:53
I don't think the synonymy is correct if the illustrated specimen is O. basilana Pic. For that matter, the type of O. pauperata is stated as "Aru" and the type of basilana is Basilan (Philippines). I have seen many Ostedes from Sabah which I have identified as O. pauperata and they all quite similar.

The picture posted by Larry looks like another species I have from Sabah. I have a total of 5 or 6 species of Ostedes from Sabah (unidentified), as well as O. pauperata, O. variegata, and O. brunneovariegata.

I have not seen types of O. borneana, griseoapicaloides, or laterifusca.

O. pauperata may occur in many areas ( Aru, Philippines, Borneo)... I don't know. The genus has only been studied by Breuning, and I think there are possibly mistakes with his work, and possibly new species in Borneo.
Xavier Posted - 22/11/2015 : 09:14:07
I think it is Ostedes pauperata Pascoe, 1859 by seeing the holotype picture from MNHN of Ostedes basilana Pic, 1944 which is a synonym.

Cerambycoidea Forum © 2000-08 Snitz Communications Go To Top Of Page
Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.07