| Author |
 Topic  |
|
Francesco
Forum Admin
Luxembourg
9442 Posts |
 Posted - 13/03/2018 : 19:20:53
|
Thank you Andreas!
Concerning your doubts:
- The designation of syntypes is perfectly according to the Code (For the purposes of the Code, three categories of specimens are regulated, namely: 72.1.1. type series...) and corresponding to the description. Otherwise, I would have described the holotype and then, described the paratypes.
I decided to design syntypes for respect to all members of the Forum.
- All owners of types are mentioned in the acknowledgements with geographic references.
- (Hathliolophia alboplagiata) I know. But this is the current name on the International market.
- May be. The fact that typical series includes new different species has already occurred in the past. At the present, I do not see reasons to separate further species... and I cannot check the DNA of all syntypes! (which, however, could not even be significant)
The manuscript has already been sent to Lambillionea.
|
 |
|
|
Xaurus
Member Rosenbergia
Germany
1912 Posts |
Posted - 13/03/2018 : 23:07:53
|
| ok, I agree - but in most cases its better to designate HT and PTs ! |
|
|
|
Francesco
Forum Admin
Luxembourg
9442 Posts |
Posted - 09/07/2018 : 19:40:43
|
Enfin... the article was published! 
All specimens of this Forum are Syntypes of the new species Eczemothea caenosa n. sp.
More details are showed here. |
|
|
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
France
12137 Posts |
Posted - 09/07/2018 : 21:01:16
|
Hé bien, super !  |
|
|
|
Gerard
Scientific Collaborator
France
5279 Posts |
Posted - 09/07/2018 : 22:00:33
|
félicitation Francesco.
Merci |
|
|
|
Francesco
Forum Admin
Luxembourg
9442 Posts |
Posted - 09/07/2018 : 22:09:04
|
quote:
Originally posted by Gerard
félicitation Francesco.
Merci
Gérard, je vais t'envoyer deux étiquettes de type avec celles de Miroshnikov. |
|
|
|
Topic |
|
Sulawesi: Eczemothea caenosa n. sp.
